“Why We Won't Purchase More
Kindles at the Unquiet Library”
This article was about some of the
drawbacks of using Kindles (as opposed to Nooks) in a library
setting. The author is a librarian herself, setting up a reading
program that utilizes e-readers. The library currently uses a fleet
of ten Kindles, but was recently contacted by Amazon asking them to
remove information from their website on how to register 6 Kindles
per account in order to share digital content. Amazon now requires a
separate email for each device, which means that managing e-book
content will have to be done separately on each Kindle. The only
library management tool offered is a subscription to Overdrive, which
is financially unfeasible for most schools and libraries, as well as
being unsuitable for younger readers. As a result, this particular
library has decided to use Nook Simple Touch instead.
I had a mixed response to this article.
On the one hand, I felt that I understood Amazon's policy; they are
simply trying to enforce licensing agreements, which is incredibly
difficult with any digital content. Sometimes extreme measures are
required. The author of the article acknowledges this, but felt that
Amazon was not being responsive to the needs of institutional
consumers. Ideally, Amazon should have come up with a management
system for libraries before enforcing the 1 account:1 device policy.
With a management system in place, I am sure libraries would be happy
to comply with copyright laws, as they do with printed content.
Sadly, I think Amazon will lose quite a few potential customers until
they are able to come up with a feasible way for schools and
libraries to manage their Kindle devices.
Good report and analysis.
ReplyDelete